Potentially interesting thoughts in this thread. Truly-in-the-know people may deliberate about whether the hold of various Marxian doctrines on the young and the impressionable can be countered by objective discourse stemming from a study of humans as humanshttps://twitter.com/pratyasharath/status/1032373231682867201 …
-
-
In my youth I thought that was how I thought I was eager to tell exactly that: theories that yield good predictions. There are no two ways about that and that's how you practice science. However, over time I realized that the thrill I got from making a predictive theory was not
-
universal. In fact few of my peers outside of science and several even inside science saw it as wideranging if not universal yardstick. With that I learned that countering the zeal of unmatta romanticism was not easy. It happens even with otherwise smart people who may like data
-
Agreed that not everyone cares. The key is showing them the predictive powers of such theories BEFORE they get taken in my romanticism. Imagine understanding Evo psych explanations of sexual dimorphism and then becoming a feminist unmatta. Not so easy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
To have an objective discourse or understanding to me is an immensely challenging thing. Humans are replete with biases and prejudices and conform themselves to group's goals and objectives. I suppose the curiosity with which we are born dampens as we grow old(most of us) with
-
Maslow hierarchy pitching in.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.