As bad as it would be if you were lying, it would be worse if you weren't. It would demonstrate that you punish behavioral signifiers like regularly interacting with people who disagree, and appearing on mass blocklists, and claiming that these are politically neutral measures.https://twitter.com/jack/status/1022196722905296896 …
Well it's more than that. They literally have a 'Trust and Safety Council' that works on the kookiest assumptions in social psychology, gender studies etc and is staffed with SJWs.
-
-
Definitely. The bias is "institutional," as they would say. I was trying to demonstrate that Jack's position was untenable from even the most charitable interpretation of Twitter policies, but it's clearly much worse in practice when you factor in things like that.
-
Indeed, and this is happening at the same time that 'AI ethics' wankers are hand-waving about 'algorithm bias' but by which they mean correct predictions which don't go the way they want. As usual, the left projects its own sins onto the other side.
-
You've probably already seen this, but it's a good primer on the problem from the data side.https://jacobitemag.com/2017/08/29/a-i-bias-doesnt-mean-what-journalists-want-you-to-think-it-means/ …
-
Yep and
@stucchio battling with the zombie hordes of Hacker News is great as well -> https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=yummyfajitas …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.