Why? I'm only citing it for fact not opinion.
-
-
Replying to @i_contemplate_ @varadmehta
Oh well still they are on same side as you reg George Will situation
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @doubtinggaurav @varadmehta
Yeah most of them have come around to at least an anti-anti-Trump position.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_ @varadmehta
They have been consistently conservative unlike .... Trump
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @doubtinggaurav
The only thing they've been consistent about is neocon wars.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
Well... I though iran sanctions and saber rattling dutifully carried out by Trump are pretty high on NeoCon agenda
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @doubtinggaurav
Yep that's the enigma of Trump - while he pushes all neocon boundaries on some issues like Iran and Jerusalem Embassy, he tries to get peace deals with North korea, and Russia. I don't actually see an Iran war happening.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @doubtinggaurav
I disagree with the 'chaos candidate' hypothesis obviously, but i'm not invested in arguing about it. I'm just enjoying the moment.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_
Come on, just admit it, in your heart you know I am right
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Nah I think, while Scott Adams overdoes his schtick, he has some parts right on. I respect a man who puts skin in the game publicly. While all the cuckservatives predicted a disaster election.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.