Ex 
if a conference gave you the option to prerecord your talk or give it live, which would you choose?
Afficher cette discussion
-
People forgive the downgraded video quality if the sound remains good. If you want to chat with the audience during the talk, you must do it live; otherwise, it feels fake—you cannot do two things at the same time. Your presence is why we want to see you, live :)
I am present in the chat while the pre-recorded me is broadcasting. And then I do the live Q&A wearing the same outfit and having the camera from the same angle. Immersive mode 
-
-
that's said, if I had options for doing it live - I would! Tailoring the talk to the audience, actually reacting to the chat (and not faking it in the recording) makes so much more sense.
-
and if it wasn't enough, here's me back to the pre-recorded talks advocate mode: conf orgs have goosebumps when I tell them I wanna do it live. They're stressed that the stream/software/internets/etc would work well and nothing breaks. Pre-recorded talk is safer for the orgs.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.