Olle Pridiuksson

Good changes from a quick glance. Would still want to know how Improbable was in breach of the ToS if all they did was auto-deploy and load balance executables compiled by devs using their own Unity license.https://twitter.com/unity3d/status/1085552836417544192 …

What's also interesting to note: Unity have completely replaced the language of section 2.4. Where it was clearly anti-competitive previously, it's essentially a free for all now (unless you breach their trademark guidelines, or insinuate you're a partner, whih is fair!)

Having seen how the sausage is made at another big corp, I can only imagine the internal struggle at Unity between cementing their market position and future service revenues via anti-competitive legalese, versus good PR. It's not often good PR plus giving up market share wins.

TL;DR: dis gud, and sometimes making noise can make a difference.

I also really hope there's a final response by Improbable.

So long as John Riccitiello doesn't inflict a fresh self inflicted wound in the AMA this afternoon, the entire ordeal should be considered resolved. IMHO, after a very clarifying blog and EULA update, the AMA now seems like it only has downsides... Damage control is done.