Their incompetence could lead them to less profits, so you can trust them as they would never do something that would reduce their profits (and profits involve you and creators staying in the platform).
-
-
Replying to @iEnriqueSP @PixelsbyTina and
Right, which is why they constantly screw the sub-box over, do experiments like this without telling anyone, and don't speak to the creators on the platform at all until they piss someone off. Youtube doesn't care about small time creators. Quit shilling.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheJakeDebate @PixelsbyTina and
They have experts in all fields in order to know what they are doing (the experiments are most of the times just to confirm their hypothesis). It is communicated to the creators once the experiments are over and they are ready to implement it and they do the same with viewers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iEnriqueSP @TheJakeDebate and
Also, they don't screw it, if their analysis says that their algorithms generate more views than whatever you think. Then they are right. Creators want more views and YouTube want more views, there is no conflict of interests there, so nothing to worry about.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iEnriqueSP @PixelsbyTina and
Jesus, you're innocence is charming if you actually believe that youtube has your best interests at heart.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheJakeDebate @PixelsbyTina and
My best interest: no. The best interest of the creators: yes. If you can find any platform where creators can get a higher revenue or higher views, then tell me. You won't find any.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iEnriqueSP @PixelsbyTina and
Because youtube has a monopoly. They're the best by virtue of being the only ones. If they had the best interest of creators they wouldn't needs subs to tick the bell, the sub box would be organized. They wouldn't do experiments like this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheJakeDebate @iEnriqueSP and
If you want to see an entire category of creators being screwed just look at animators. Or anyone who is instantly demonetized seconds after uploading a video. Or channels being copyright claimed for their original works.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheJakeDebate @PixelsbyTina and
There are legal reasons or trade-offs for everything you have said before. You have to tick a bell because the usual user is subscribed to a lot of channels which is the problem of the feed (many videos get lost) and get a notification of just some of them which engages the user
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iEnriqueSP @TheJakeDebate and
more. Demonetisation is another trade-off. They need to assure advertisers that the content of the videos on the platform respect the rules of YouTube. As they cannot revise every video on YouTube, they need to apply algorithms for that (which may be faulty in some cases, not the
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
mayority of them). That can cause a bit of resignation, however it is the only way to assure them that the videos respect rules. The algorithm can't assure all videos taken down don't respect the rules but you can assure that any video that is not taken down respect the rules.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.