I respond to question "How can you continue to call it [Lightning Process} quackery, when the results are positive? coyneoftherealm.com/blogs/news/par
Conversation
Replying to
I doubt that they are positive. For p=0;003 to be credible that would need prior of 0,3 that NLP works. Who can believe that?
2
5
10
I made a vow to keep clear of CFS -it's a minefield and nobody knows anything useful about it. Unsolved problem
2
1
Well that sounds like a recipe for self-perpetuating ignorance.
1
4
It isn't my field and there ate no leads for research. There are many unsolved problems in medicine. CFS is one of them
2
1
You dont need to know about it to debunk the quacks.
There is a lot of science available - Early days but looks like autoimmunity involved.
1
2
well that's one of the problems. There is tons of bad science, but very little good. Nobody knows where to start so clutching at straws
Our recent NICE submission gives an overview of the state of #MEcfs research, the good, the bad and the ugly! meaction.net/2017/07/23/nic
1
1
There’s definitely good stuff and interesting leads. Moved on in last couple of years. The biomedical pieces are coming together. Needs 💰
1