Quote Tweet
Replying to @CoyneoftheRealm
I doubt that they are positive. For p=0;003 to be credible that would need prior of 0,3 that NLP works. Who can believe that?
4
18
34
Conversation
at the LP website told me they were quacks: why on earth would actual doctors
1
1
I can only assume that the authors of the SMILE trial failed to do their homework about NLP. That's negligent, IMO
5
6
25
Does rather seem like the perfect subject for you to blog about.
1
4
Blogging about CFS is like stepping into a pit of vipers
'Vipers' or political interests. I imagine sufferers would be more than grateful. If political interests determine your scepticism...
8
understand where u are coming from but patients just want good science, & quackery exposed has survived, I imagine u can 2
5
Can understand why you feel that way, but it's really not. That's part of the narrative. All patients want is good science and fair judgment. When faced with minefield is when we most need people with expertise.
1
23
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Show replies
I understand what you mean. Patients are very frustrated with the situation. However, you can play a part in making the situation better.
7
I blogged about CFS/ME a couple of years ago and remained viper-free: steamtraen.blogspot.fr/2015/12/my-cur
1
2
24
Replying to
Thanks for that sensible piece. Re harassment, I always think surely psychiatrists meet much scarier people than CFS patients?
4
Maybe you could interview David Tuller or something like that?
2
1