Quote Tweet
Replying to @CoyneoftheRealm
I doubt that they are positive. For p=0;003 to be credible that would need prior of 0,3 that NLP works. Who can believe that?
Conversation
SMC again fails to engage with critics' concerns about its promotion of a methodologically flawed trial. See also #PACEtrial
2
When I was diagnosed of course I checked out alternative remedies. One look
at the LP website told me they were quacks: why on earth would actual doctors
1
1
I can only assume that the authors of the SMILE trial failed to do their homework about NLP. That's negligent, IMO
5
6
25
Show replies
Surely historically the bad science that needed calling out was always a 'pit of vipers:' lobotomies, conversion therapy etc.
3