Carolyn Wilshire@wilshica·Apr 7, 2017I finally realise what PwMEs are up against! These gems appeared in a FORMAL review of one of our recent articles. (by a PACE supporter):3097131
DoctorO@OrmrodPamela·Apr 7, 2017Replying to @wilshicaWhat a bizarre,verging on hysterical, 'formal' response to yr superb article. Please continue yr 'obsessive poring over' the truth re PACE!1626
Carolyn Wilshire@wilshicaReplying to @OrmrodPamelaThnks! Actually, its worse this person was peer reviewing a new article we recently submitted to a (very prominent) journal!9:18 AM · Apr 7, 2017·Twitter Web Client5 Retweets27 Likes
Jay Spero@ssppeerroo·Apr 7, 2017Replying to @wilshica and @OrmrodPamelaNormally this wouldn't surprise me one bit...except, this is unbelievably harsh. Disgraceful--and quite unscientific as well.2519
Carolyn Wilshire@wilshica·Apr 7, 2017Replying to @ssppeerroo and @OrmrodPamelaI didn't explain, this was a peer review report for a journal. That's why its so outrageous!3716