Conversation

Janet Eastham

@JanetEastham

Here is the series of questions I put to

@WesselyS

at the #StandingupforScience panel discussion last night. This tweet is one of three.

3:16 PM · Mar 30, 2017Twitter Web Client

Replying to

This is the second part of the questions I put to Wessely at #StandingUpForScience

Replying to

This is the third and final part of the questioning #StandingupforScience

Replying to

thanks for your bravery and eloquent criticism . The responses to your questions are almost unbelievable.

Replying to

and

If there are signs of inflammatory markers, failure to to incorporate them into PACE is deliberate oversight

Replying to

oh dear

the problem is that if you adhere to believing standards were high then you need to accept the null result.

Replying to

and

Janet, thanks for questioning the manipulative bugger. Is it him I sue for all my forthcoming hospital treatments?

Replying to

and

the subjective outcomes showed....null result.

Replying to

Thanks a lot for reporting

Alison Orr

Replying to

and

So frustrating and infuriating TY for your candour Janet Our time will come I just hope it's in my lifetime #pwme #mecfs #retractPACE

Thomas Henry Anderson

Replying to

and

Odd - makes distinction between criticism and abuse - then won't discuss scientific criticism from renowned geneticist Ron Davis.