Unless there are portions of the tape that somehow negate criminal intent, "I just want to find 11,780 votes" and his threats against Raffensperger and his counsel violate 52 U.S. Code § 20511. His best defense would be insanity.https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/d45acb92-4dc4-11eb-bda4-615aaefd0555_story.html …
-
-
Important nuance
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In order for them to be worried, they’d need to believe they were going to be prosecuted. I haven’t seen the first indication anyone is willing to do that. So, thus far, at least, nit sure they have anything to be “worried” about.

-
This is not correct. They don't have to be concerned they will be prosecuted. They only have to be involved in a conspiracy to violate that federal election statute. In other words, did they know the purpose of the call? No doubt they did. No other reason to call the GA SOS.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
RICO -- and it includes the RNC.
-
Yes to this. Extortion is a predicate act.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Kind sir: As the attorney representing Mark Meadows, I demand that you retract this statement about my client's jeopard-- Sorry I'm informed that I, too, am under investigation now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They should be disbarred at the very least.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly - his lawyers knew a crime was occurring and stood by and did nothing. The ABA must investigate and determine culpability
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.