Analysis of the American Space Commerce Free Enterprise Act of 2017
(thread) So I guess it's time to analyze what this Bill does (and doesn't do) and how it lines up (or doesn't) with the Trump Admin's push for #space regulatory reform /1https://twitter.com/SpcPlcyOnline/status/987638612543098881 …
TLDR; HR 2809 makes several major changes to the way the USG provides oversight of commercial space activities that are basically about as "light touch" and industry-friendly as you can get /2
Like the WH proposal, the Bill moves nearly all licensing authority to Office of Space Commerce (OSC) under @CommerceGov. @FCC keeps spectrum licensing and @FAA keeps launch & re-entry licensing /3
Also like the WH proposal, the Bill reforms existing remote sensing licensing process to improve certainty (although it now calls them "permits", which may just be semantics) /4pic.twitter.com/g3ZZjnp6eo
The Bill gives SecComm sole authority to decide permits, with "consultation" with other agencies as they consider necessary. This presumably restricts ability of #natsec community to block applications /5pic.twitter.com/NHPhnVBdJL
The Bill also narrows the definition of what's covered by the permits, sets a 90-day timer for applications, a presumption of approval if Commerce doesn't act, and an appeals process for denials (all good things) /6
Also like the WH proposal, the Bill gives OSC new authority to provide "certification to operate" all the new types of commercial space activities not covered by current licenses (what the Obama Admin called "mission authorization" /7pic.twitter.com/c3kXZz7qPK
The certification process has same 90-day timer, presumption of approval, and "consultation" requirement as remote sensing licensing process /8
However, the Bill places big restrictions on what US "international obligations" can be included in the process (only the Big 4 space treaties) /9pic.twitter.com/PDN8PENrUx
Companies only have to give a letter attesting that they are abiding by a few provisions of the OST (isn't that the responsibility of @StateDept ????) and the USG must presume the companies are telling the truth /10pic.twitter.com/9f32668Czv
Leading you to wonder if maybe this is the new license application /11pic.twitter.com/2Ke6in0mv6
Companies will be required to submit a #spacedebris mitigation plan, but it only covers a very limited number of items and ability of Commerce to require mitigation steps is very limited /12pic.twitter.com/kpde3CZMkL
The Bill does create civil (not criminal) penalties up to $500k for any company that does not comply with the requirements or operates without a permit/certificate /13pic.twitter.com/9XcJP3aqRc
The Bill also includes a weird provision saying space is not to be considered a global commons (feels like this is someone's pet peeve) /14pic.twitter.com/CcWNdkIQ8y
The Bill authorizes (but does not appropriate) a paltry $5 million for OSC to carry out all these new duties, which is far more than they currently get but far less than what they likely need /15pic.twitter.com/OAgV1qMffp
Finally, the Bill does not really address the civil #SSA and Space Traffic Management policy changes that VP Pence announced last week (which will be the subject of another thread in the near future) /end