Skip to content

Secret Brexit Impact Assessments "a costly vanity exercise"

On Wednesday, Jo Swinson was given an hour to pore over the Government's top-secret Brexit Impact Assessments. What did she learn? Swipe right to find out...

Today I viewed the 'sectoral analysis' in the Brexit reading room. I was handed two hefty lever arch files. During my slot I managed to look at 24 of the 39 separate papers. (1)

101 replies 1,684 retweets 1,600 likes

Of these 24 sectors, the papers show that in 21 of them, industry has concerns about skills gaps, attracting talent and labour mobility post-Brexit. (2)

8 replies 188 retweets 335 likes

The papers detail calls from many sectors to remain part of existing EU institutions, programmes or agreements, such as EASA, Euratom, IEM, Horizon 2020, Erasmus and SES. (3)

7 replies 205 retweets 323 likes

The government has also been lobbied by many sectors for EU regulations to be kept or mirrored exactly, or face significant negative consequences. (4)

6 replies 177 retweets 291 likes

Frustratingly only MPs & Peers can see these papers, and armed with pen and paper only. I transcribed the parts I have recreated here. Yet given the caveat below printed on every document, there is no reason for them not to be freely available online. (5)

11 replies 226 retweets 380 likes

This is how the contents are described. For example, the Agriculture one had 35 pages of background facts, and 5 pages of sector views. Most worryingly: no analysis at all of what the impact of Brexit could be. (6)

11 replies 178 retweets 264 likes

Of course the government now claim they never did any sectoral impact assessments, only sectoral analysis. (7)

5 replies 102 retweets 199 likes

But that rather conflicts with what David Davis has been saying for months. (8)

5 replies 139 retweets 279 likes

This raises the prospect either that the production of these papers and conspicuous secrecy around their content is nothing more than a costly vanity exercise to cover up Davis' errors in telling the Select Committee the analysis existed in 'excruciating detail'... (9)

14 replies 174 retweets 368 likes

Or that the Government has withheld the key impact analysis from what it has released to Parliament, which goes against the House of Commons motion of 1 Nov. I almost hope it is the latter, as that would mean the government has actually done some impact analysis. (10)

5 replies 173 retweets 398 likes

Bottom line: even from my hour perusing the government's collation of Brexit views across 24 sectors, it was blindingly obvious what a far-reaching, ridiculous folly this whole Brexit debacle is. (11/ENDS)

41 replies 725 retweets 1,461 likes