Retired CIA officer weighs in on tension between CIA and Trump

Politics December 14, 2016
Meghna Chakrabarti of Radio Boston interviewed Glenn Carle, who worked for the CIA for 23 years before retiring in 2007, about the ongoing clashes between President-elect Donald Trump and the intelligence community at large.

<Thread> Interviewed a 23-year CIA veteran today. He had one of the most unflinching, critical assessments of PEOTUS/CIA story I've heard.

71 replies 983 retweets 1,112 likes

Highlights thread. First, background. Spoke with Glenn Carle. He worked at CIA for 23 years, from Reagan to George W. Bush.

1 reply 92 retweets 142 likes

Carle retired in 2007 from CIA's Clandestine Service as deputy national intelligence officer for transnational threats.

1 reply 73 retweets 115 likes

He worked on four continents, and participated in the CIA/Bush admin's "enhanced interrogation" efforts in early 2000s. Later wrote a book

2 replies 63 retweets 114 likes

highly critical of CIA and White House "War on Terror". He did things he's not proud of. Believes CIA failed in its core mission then.

1 reply 86 retweets 171 likes

Carle says the current rift between PEOTUS and intelligence community is even worse. Historic crisis. Believes immediate action must be

4 replies 249 retweets 346 likes

taken, including declassifying the CIA Russia analysis, in a way that does not reveal methods or sources.

6 replies 201 retweets 328 likes

His greater concern is that the lack of trust between PEOTUS Trump and CIA destroys the intelligence community's very reason for being:

23 replies 614 retweets 804 likes

Exactly how unusual is this moment? Carle says unprecedented. Others (Hayden) have said similar. Their point is that POTUS always has right

1 reply 109 retweets 203 likes

to argue with IC assessments. It happens often. Carle says he's never seen a rejection of fact going back to Eisenhower administration.

2 replies 292 retweets 401 likes

Rejection of analysis in Carle's view amounts to PEOTUS rejection of entire purpose of intel community.

7 replies 369 retweets 478 likes

He takes it as an affront to their professionalism and service to American national security.

2 replies 89 retweets 233 likes

I pressed him on a couple of points. 1) This is a leaked analysis that needs confirmation/investigation. He agreed. 2) The CIA's own past.

72 retweets 139 likes

Missteps. Including WMD/Iraq threat assessment. He said, "It is true that WMD we got wrong."

6 replies 64 retweets 113 likes

Isn't this a legitimate source of continued doubt/skepticism among American public and PEOTUS? I also ask him about his own doubts he had

1 reply 47 retweets 95 likes

about the Agency he had in the past. He wrote about them in 2011 in his book, "The Interrogator: An Education." Brief aside here...

1 reply 42 retweets 86 likes

Carle was assigned to interrogate a person believed to be a high level Al Qaeda member. "Enhanced Interrogation." He becomes disilluioned

2 replies 48 retweets 85 likes

with 'self-protective instincts' of intel community, and moral failing of Admin/IC to have embraced torture. His suspect turns out to be

43 retweets 88 likes

low level. An 'egregious' error, Carle says. CIA refuses to release captive b/c to do so would have shown "War on Terror" to be a

46 retweets 90 likes

So I asked him if, and why, he has faith in the agency now? He says because the book is also about American idealism:

4 replies 69 retweets 137 likes

He believes CIA has tried to rectify past errors. Also, see Gen. Hayden interview - Hayden believes CIA is taking high risk w/ assessmt

2 replies 64 retweets 111 likes

Brings us back to Carle. I ask him about views from other high level IC people. Hayden says to bridge trust gap, CIA has to "get in

45 retweets 73 likes

"...president's head. We need to get our version of reality in front of the President. We have to work hard to make that happen." Hayden

4 replies 55 retweets 95 likes

I spoke with Ret. Admiral James Stavridis ystdy. He believes that trust btw PEOTUS/IC can be built, given time. See:

8 replies 49 retweets 66 likes

Does Carle believe the same thing? He says plainly, powerfully: No.

10 replies 238 retweets 332 likes

Carle believes he is in "no way representing a partisan faction of the national security establishment."

1 reply 68 retweets 105 likes

Again, he retired in 2007, so not directly inside IC now. But did serve in CIA for 23 years from Reagan to GWB. He says this is a "crisis"

6 replies 109 retweets 143 likes

from the agency level all the way down to individual officers. That's how worried he is right now.

11 replies 345 retweets 408 likes

One view, one man. Audio of on air conversation here: <END THREAD>

19 replies 243 retweets 366 likes