Skip to content

Retired CIA officer weighs in on tension between CIA and Trump

Politics December 14, 2016
Meghna Chakrabarti of Radio Boston interviewed Glenn Carle, who worked for the CIA for 23 years before retiring in 2007, about the ongoing clashes between President-elect Donald Trump and the intelligence community at large.

<Thread> Interviewed a 23-year CIA veteran today. He had one of the most unflinching, critical assessments of PEOTUS/CIA story I've heard.

70 replies 931 retweets 1,049 likes
Replying to

Highlights thread. First, background. Spoke with Glenn Carle. He worked at CIA for 23 years, from Reagan to George W. Bush.

1 reply 90 retweets 136 likes
Replying to

Carle retired in 2007 from CIA's Clandestine Service as deputy national intelligence officer for transnational threats.

70 retweets 111 likes
Replying to

He worked on four continents, and participated in the CIA/Bush admin's "enhanced interrogation" efforts in early 2000s. Later wrote a book

1 reply 59 retweets 110 likes
Replying to

highly critical of CIA and White House "War on Terror". He did things he's not proud of. Believes CIA failed in its core mission then.

1 reply 82 retweets 164 likes
Replying to

Carle says the current rift between PEOTUS and intelligence community is even worse. Historic crisis. Believes immediate action must be

4 replies 234 retweets 329 likes
Replying to

taken, including declassifying the CIA Russia analysis, in a way that does not reveal methods or sources.

6 replies 189 retweets 312 likes
Replying to

His greater concern is that the lack of trust between PEOTUS Trump and CIA destroys the intelligence community's very reason for being:

23 replies 568 retweets 754 likes
Replying to

Carle agrees with frmr CIA acting director Morell that this is 'political equivalent of 9/11." Carle goes further.

36 replies 1,047 retweets 1,134 likes
Replying to

Exactly how unusual is this moment? Carle says unprecedented. Others (Hayden) have said similar. Their point is that POTUS always has right

1 reply 97 retweets 192 likes
Replying to

to argue with IC assessments. It happens often. Carle says he's never seen a rejection of fact going back to Eisenhower administration.

2 replies 269 retweets 379 likes
Replying to

Rejection of analysis in Carle's view amounts to PEOTUS rejection of entire purpose of intel community.

6 replies 342 retweets 452 likes
Replying to

He takes it as an affront to their professionalism and service to American national security.

2 replies 82 retweets 215 likes
Replying to

I pressed him on a couple of points. 1) This is a leaked analysis that needs confirmation/investigation. He agreed. 2) The CIA's own past.

67 retweets 132 likes
Replying to

Missteps. Including WMD/Iraq threat assessment. He said, "It is true that WMD we got wrong."

6 replies 60 retweets 106 likes
Replying to

Isn't this a legitimate source of continued doubt/skepticism among American public and PEOTUS? I also ask him about his own doubts he had

1 reply 43 retweets 89 likes
Replying to

about the Agency he had in the past. He wrote about them in 2011 in his book, "The Interrogator: An Education." Brief aside here...

1 reply 38 retweets 80 likes
Replying to

Carle was assigned to interrogate a person believed to be a high level Al Qaeda member. "Enhanced Interrogation." He becomes disilluioned

2 replies 44 retweets 76 likes
Replying to

with 'self-protective instincts' of intel community, and moral failing of Admin/IC to have embraced torture. His suspect turns out to be

39 retweets 79 likes
Replying to

low level. An 'egregious' error, Carle says. CIA refuses to release captive b/c to do so would have shown "War on Terror" to be a

42 retweets 82 likes
Replying to

'house of cards'. He's very critical of CIA in the book. See:

57 retweets 110 likes
Replying to

So I asked him if, and why, he has faith in the agency now? He says because the book is also about American idealism:

4 replies 64 retweets 129 likes
Replying to

He believes CIA has tried to rectify past errors. Also, see Gen. Hayden interview - Hayden believes CIA is taking high risk w/ assessmt

2 replies 59 retweets 105 likes
Replying to
87 retweets 124 likes
Replying to

Brings us back to Carle. I ask him about views from other high level IC people. Hayden says to bridge trust gap, CIA has to "get in

41 retweets 66 likes
Replying to

"...president's head. We need to get our version of reality in front of the President. We have to work hard to make that happen." Hayden

4 replies 51 retweets 87 likes
Replying to

I spoke with Ret. Admiral James Stavridis ystdy. He believes that trust btw PEOTUS/IC can be built, given time. See:

8 replies 43 retweets 63 likes
Replying to

Does Carle believe the same thing? He says plainly, powerfully: No.

10 replies 221 retweets 320 likes
Replying to

Carle believes he is in "no way representing a partisan faction of the national security establishment."

1 reply 64 retweets 99 likes
Replying to

Again, he retired in 2007, so not directly inside IC now. But did serve in CIA for 23 years from Reagan to GWB. He says this is a "crisis"

6 replies 103 retweets 136 likes
Replying to

from the agency level all the way down to individual officers. That's how worried he is right now.

11 replies 321 retweets 385 likes
Replying to

One view, one man. Audio of on air conversation here: <END THREAD>

18 replies 223 retweets 343 likes