Seriously, you won't find this amount of dishing anywhere else. Where few others would dare, Rodrigo has bravely come forth to illuminate the collusion between corporate, academic, and military pushers of "ethical AI." 8/
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Do you care about how corporate profit agendas shape the research, policymaking, and national conversations around the software that governs your life and that is deployed against enemies of the state? Read this piece. 9/
1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 32 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
This piece is a great counterpoint to the argument of technological determinism: "If we don't build it, someone else will." Perhaps interrogate who planted the thought that "it," whatever technology, was worth building in the first place? 10/
6 proslijeđenih tweetova 41 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Finally: this is not new! In the 1970s and 80s, the US private insurance industry invented the idea of "actuarial fairness" to protect itself from charges of discrimination by activists and evade legal regulation, as Ochigame et al. have written earlier. Sound familiar? 11/
1 reply 6 proslijeđenih tweetova 53 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
For more, check out their paper "Beyond Legitimation: Rethinking Fairness, Interpretability, and Accuracy in Machine Learning": 12/https://www.dropbox.com/s/6ue5knrlvbxiavy/Ochigame%20et%20al%20-%20Beyond%20Legitimation.pdf?dl=0 …
6 proslijeđenih tweetova 49 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Katherine Ye je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceMaybe: Fred Benenson
Important note (via
@rg9119):https://twitter.com/fredbenenson/status/1208459945919700992 …Katherine Ye je dodan/na,
3 proslijeđena tweeta 21 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
I boosted this piece because it rings true with my + friends' experiences in CS academia & bc it starts an important conversation about influence + ideas. But I think it's important to note the tension b/t the author's intent with the piece and the impact it may actually have.
1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 24 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Katherine Ye je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceMaybe: Fred Benenson
Seconding
@fredbenenson's point that this is a complicated take, and to center voices from folks with other lived experiences in the conversation.https://twitter.com/fredbenenson/status/1208459946800508928 …Katherine Ye je dodan/na,
1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
A friend in the FAT* community adds that they think the piece flattens complex issues around incrementalism vs reform in the field, but that it's hard to have a public conversation about the field's struggles with power, because it requires disclosing even more insider knowledge.
3 proslijeđena tweeta 28 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Lots of complicated conversations happening now around this piece. I want to second
@gleemie's call to center grassroots orgs that are led by the folks who are most affected by algorithmic injustice—as the writer does! https://twitter.com/gleemie/status/1208793442509152258 …pic.twitter.com/D80lMXQHtQ
1 reply 7 proslijeđenih tweetova 18 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
Katherine Ye je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceLilly Irani
And to focus on the structural forces at work in shaping the discourse around "ethics in AI."https://twitter.com/gleemie/status/1208789520172253184 …
Katherine Ye je dodan/na,
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.