Lately I've been struck by how the tools I use subtly shape the way I write, and so how I think. A few months ago, a friend and I wondered: what if we made our own interface for writing? how would it change us?
Show this thread
-
So we designed an interface for conversational writing called "part of speech." You can write and edit as usual on the left, and talk with a partner on the right. Its responses are meant to evoke and suggest, not answer. Everything you say on the right will appear on the left.pic.twitter.com/0y0nYPxEVT
Show this thread
“part of speech” is a simple, rough prototype that we banged out in a weekend. But it worked. With it I wrote things I couldn’t have written alone—articulated thoughts I couldn't have had alone. Here’s something we wrote: red like an ocean green like a tomato blue like a dollar
-
-
I wanted to explore visual tension in language, so I started by saying: “Red like an ocean. Green like a tomato. Blue like a...” I struggled to complete the trio. Consulting "part of speech" yielded the phrase “income levels,” suggesting “blue like a dollar.” A stunning image!pic.twitter.com/fYOY5O59Qz
Show this thread -
When you make your own tools, you tend to mold them to fit your hands. So they may fit others' poorly. Other people who tried "part of speech" told me that the experience felt dehumanizing, that the conversation partner's responses felt irrelevant and jarring. I feel that too.
Show this thread -
I also don’t use “part of speech” for some forms of writing, for example if I'm coming with a clear outline in mind. I use it for exploratory writing—when I don’t know where I’m going and want to find myself in a place that resonates somehow. Just as in conversation.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.