@peterritchie Sure, so why make something completely new, why not contribute to something on that page you linked?
-
-
Replying to @mletterle
@mletterle Multi-million dollar organization like Outercurve... MSFT is dysfunctional.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peterritchie2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @hunterpaulam
@huntermkt The fact that MSFT needs Outercurve to be involved collaboratively in OSS means MSFT is dysfunction in certain ways.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peterritchie
@peterritchie didn't IBM need Eclipse? Apache? We aren't the only way MSFT collaborates, they contribute direct to the Linux kernel++2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hunterpaulam
@huntermkt That's what I mean by a reflection of the US legal system/copyright laws. MSFT shouldn't *need* Outercurve.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peterritchie
@peterritchie FOSS foundations act as neutral playgrounds to encourage corporate contribution. W/out neutral ownership, no one would play.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stephenrwalli
@stephenrwalli That's the dysfunctionality I'm talking about.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@peterritchie @stephenrwalli <interesting, so are Openstack, Linux Foundation, & LibreOffice dystunctional? Are all foss.orgs?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.