Has it not occurred to you that people's lives are in danger when widespread crime makes it impossible for them to obtain basic goods like food or medicine? (I know the answer: It has not occurred to you, because you clearly haven't bothered to think the matter through.)
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes, I understand that you're pro-theft b/c you haven't thought this matter through. When crime drives businesses out of a neighborhood, what usually takes their place is ... nothing. Within a few years, there are no businesses left to steal from.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Over time, widespread crime makes it much more difficult for people to obtain basic needs. If you were, as you claim, "pro housing and feeding people," you would not be pro-crime. Active policing is the solution here, not vigilantism.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The past twenty-five years proves you dead wrong on your last 2 points. I'll agree with you that we incarcerate too many criminals & criminalize some of the wrong things. But that doesn't mean we should adopt a pro-theft position as you do, & dispense with law & order altogether.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not anymore. Certain areas of the US, including San Francisco, have experienced massive spikes in property crime AND violent crime over the past 13 months, & police officers are leaving in droves. Returning to the former status quo, flawed as it was, would be a great improvement.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
It's "weak" when local governments deliberately sabotage it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.