What did you disagree with in the article?
-
-
Replying to @jessesingal
Literally nobody wants to read you go on about how desistance is "totally a good idea you guys for real" It doesn't help
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hulagulag
the response to the article has been positive so far, and it's getting read by a solid number of people
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jessesingal
How much of the positive response has been from trans people? Humour me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hulagulag
Some of it! Trans folks have a wide range of views on this stuff (of course).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jessesingal
My earlier question is still relevant by the way What makes you as a cis male qualified to write about treating trans kids?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hulagulag @jessesingal
he's a literally a science & health journalist. Science writers who write abt cancer don't have to have it, do they?
5 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @UOPsychGrad
i'd side-eye any science writer who stands behind the idea of not treating cancer and letting it fix itself instead.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hulagulag
is that what he wrote? That people should never transitoon? If so I take it back.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UOPsychGrad
He's basically pushing the idea that not starting trans kids on meds that would help them just in case they're not REALLY trans
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The side-effect if they're not is pretty much only slightly delayed puberty.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.