It is just that graphs seem popular and powerful, whereas ‘maps’ are often less well defined and are perhaps old-fashioned. @behrenstimb @jcrwhittington https://twitter.com/biorxiv_neursci/status/1173734640747732992 …
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.002 … 2/2
-
-
-
Lots of past debate on what is 'really a map'. The place cells, to me, still provide compelling evidence that open space can be represented in what could be considered a geometric map like way, rather than just a topological representation.
- Još 9 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Very nice review. What do you think is the best definition of a map in the brain? Can it include a graph of states connected by actions? Do you think there is good evidence for non-retinotopic, 2D/3D maps in the brain (i.e with an origin and 2D/3D axes, not just graphs)? 1/2
-
Let's not forget this nice review from Bill Warren, in which he argues that there is little evidence for Euclidean maps and that navigation behaviour is generally better explained by a labeled graph:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30728233-non-euclidean-navigation/?from_term=warren+w+navigation+graph&from_pos=1 …
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I'm stoked to read this!
-
Thanks Marissa. I’d be interested in your thoughts.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
my view, from place cell recordings in dorsal hippocampus, is that neurons can respond to many features, but strongly pre-disposed to spatially salient. First experiments in early 1980s were looking for many features but generally saw space.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.