1/ This is an interesting idea. Leaving aside the issue of whether this would actually stop the rise of altcoins, I doubt that in-protocol incentives for future development would be feasible.https://twitter.com/naval/status/985018594252742656 …
-
-
11/ In Bitcoin’s case, it’s clear how block rewards (and later transaction fees) help secure the network. The effort spent chasing the rewards is directly linked to network security. 100%.
Show this thread -
12/ But it’s not always so simple. An example of a perverse incentive is Ethereum Casper’s concept of “inactivity leak”. In trying to incentivize nodes to stay online, you might inadvertently *disincentivize* them instead.https://twitter.com/TuurDemeester/status/981720971223629825 …
Show this thread -
13/ A similar argument can be made for any protocol that fancies the idea of embedding governance into the protocol & have stake holders vote on protocol changes. Democracy will never produce a good engineering system. It’s akin to asking the mob on how to design a space shuttle.
Show this thread -
14/ The more complex the rules, the harder it is to ensure that the arising dynamics match exactly what you want, or not have unintended effects.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
