1/ Exactly. I never understood why companies cannot build so-called "tokenized services" directly on top of established tokens such as BTC (yes, BTC was the original token). The whole category of "utility tokens" just doesn't make any sense.https://twitter.com/MaxFangX/status/976031730460012545 …
-
-
Network currencies capture the value of networks that they are intrinsic to. At the expense of liquidity (money) but capture the transaction value of the network in the token itself. Bitcoin isn’t money either, ftm
-
You still haven't answered my question: what prevents these networks from using BTC as its native token? What is it that forces these networks to develop their own tokens?
-
Did you read the article? Your token can (and bitcoin won’t) 1. Capture the transaction value of your network 2. Capture the network effect 3. Coordinate your network functions
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Slowdown on the insults and reread. Say which argument you refute and how. Not hand waving about “money” or “centralization”.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
