Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
hugohanoi's profile
Hugo Nguyen
Hugo Nguyen
Hugo Nguyen
@hugohanoi

Tweets

Hugo Nguyen

@hugohanoi

I chain, therefore I am ⛓️

Joined April 2012

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Philip Daian‏ @phildaian Feb 13
      Replying to @hugohanoi @TokenHash and

      It's ill suited if the class of engineers you are delegating to is *ill-defined* (eg if one can argue their membership in this set). See: Bitcoin If this set of engineers is OTOH made explicit, it is quite a good & clear model IMO. This is the "benevolent dictatorship" model.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    2. Philip Daian‏ @phildaian Feb 13
      Replying to @phildaian @hugohanoi and

      The problem I have with BTC governance is the continued refusal to make this set explicit *as a community* (a set that, e.g., voting is very suited for choosing). The other problem I have is disingenuous charlatans insisting the process is apolitical when it's anything but.

      4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    3. Hugo Nguyen‏ @hugohanoi Feb 14
      Replying to @phildaian @TokenHash and

      1/ Anything that involves human decision-making has some political element, sure. But engineers (& scientists) are *specifically trained* to avoid political bias & to think objectively.

      2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
    4. Hugo Nguyen‏ @hugohanoi Feb 14
      Replying to @hugohanoi @phildaian and

      2/ This and the fact that they are technically competent, make them the most qualified to drive the technology forward. Not the masses.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Hugo Nguyen‏ @hugohanoi Feb 14
      Replying to @hugohanoi @phildaian and

      3/ A better way than “making the set of engineers explicit” via some form of election, is to leave the development process open (as it is now), but do two things:

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Hugo Nguyen‏ @hugohanoi Feb 14
      Replying to @hugohanoi @phildaian and

      4/ a) have complete transparency (public peer reviews) and b) define an objective standard through which we can evaluate technical changes.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Hugo Nguyen‏ @hugohanoi Feb 14
      Replying to @hugohanoi @phildaian and

      5/ The BIP process is already very close to this system (although I’m sure we can do a better job in terms of defining the objective standard). Part of the reason people mistook the block size for a political issue is because we don’t agree on the objective standard.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    8. Hugo Nguyen‏ @hugohanoi Feb 14
      Replying to @hugohanoi @phildaian and

      6/ This IMO is better than your idea of voting the engineers in. For a couple of reasons. First, just because you vote some people in doesn’t mean they don’t have political bias, or can’t acquire bias *after* they get voted in.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Hugo Nguyen‏ @hugohanoi Feb 14
      Replying to @hugohanoi @phildaian and

      7/ Secondly, by introducing an election process you allow the possibility that the election could be gamed (who would be the judge of such an election, btw?). You also add a bureaucratic bottleneck that could deter potential contributors from contributing.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Hugo Nguyen‏ @hugohanoi Feb 14
      Replying to @hugohanoi @phildaian and

      8/ Rather than doing that, OSS is about having a hands-off approach at the system input: everyone who is worth his/her salt can contribute. And enforcing quality *at the system output*: code is reviewed & subjected to a common, objective standard that everyone agrees on.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Hugo Nguyen‏ @hugohanoi Feb 14
      Replying to @hugohanoi @phildaian and

      9/ I believe this process is a good model for the so-called “governance” of blockchain protocol development. Again, contingent on the fact that we define the common objective standard clearly.

      1:17 AM - 14 Feb 2018
      • 1 Like
      • Mitchell Bradley
      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        1. New conversation
        2. Vitalik Non-giver of Ether‏Verified account @VitalikButerin Feb 14
          Replying to @hugohanoi @phildaian and

          > Again, contingent on the fact that we define the common objective standard clearly. IMO this is impossible.

          1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes
        3. Hugo Nguyen‏ @hugohanoi Feb 14
          Replying to @VitalikButerin @phildaian and

          Why not? eg: many would agree that Bitcoin has these high-level requirements (ranked by priority): 1) Security (immutability of ledger + secure token ownership) 2) Decentralization 3) Scalability 4) Privacy When there're conflicting goals, higher priority req takes precedence.

          2 replies 1 retweet 1 like
        4. Hugo Nguyen‏ @hugohanoi Feb 14
          Replying to @hugohanoi @VitalikButerin and

          You can flesh it out further of cos. E.g.: How to go about making trade-offs, in what scenarios they are allowed.
 If you disagree with said standard, that’s the signal for forking off to your own blockchain.

          0 replies 1 retweet 1 like
        5. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info