There is some thinking that total immutability could actually happen, once a blockchain hosts enough value and enough parties with different interests become invested, it could become too difficult to make any changes to the code anymore. See SegWit as a possible precursor.
Not sure I agree. Sure we should try to improve existing governance. But governance is ultimately a people problem. By removing humans from the equation altogether, we can scale in other dimensions (ie: social scalability). Stasis can be good :-)
-
-
At some stage some upgrade or changes will almost certainly be required. Denying that only builds in obsolescence. Black/white often leads to perve we (and unintended) consequences. The human factor allows flexibility to deal with that.
-
*perverse* consequences
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
