That's where you're wrong. A majority of the users supported BIP148, and even if it turned out not all of them were enforcing, a split would have pushed the supporters who didn't enforce to begin doing so.
6/ The author of BIP148 himself, ShaolinFry, had second thoughts about BIP148. It was exactly what prompted him to create BIP149- a safer alternative.
-
-
7/ Speaking of which, the fact that there were multiple Core Devs against merging BIP148 to Core was clear evidence that your statement “support for BIP148 == support for Segwit” is not true. Unless you are saying Core Devs are not part of the “community.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
BIP149 was not at all safer. It was far worse.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
