The majority of users were not enforcing bip148. Had some miners dare to defy bip148's proposal, there would have been 2 used chains. You can't dictate that I'm an "ex-full node" for not enforcing bip148 against my will.
when did I claim that? "I know" is anecdotal. What's "plenty"? "plenty" out of what? No one stops you from running a BIP148 node, but claiming BIP148 was safe / not reckless is ridiculous.
-
-
and how is that "not representing reality" exactly? did I claim that there was zero support for BIP148? I'm merely pointing out that there were other voices out there besides the BIP148 group.
-
You are literally not even reading what I'm typing.
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

