2/ Money only works as an incentive up to a certain extent. If you are broke and someone offers you a chance to earn a million dollar, you would die for that chance. Otoh, if you already are a multimillionaire, would you be swayed by such a chance? It depends.
-
-
Show this thread
-
3/ You have other things to consider if you’re already loaded, such as reputation or personal moral values. It might not be worth it. So Point 1: the effect of money works differently on different people.
Show this thread -
4/ Historically, using equity as incentive also created some messed up situations where CEOs lied / practiced financial shenanigans (eg: https://hbr.org/2014/09/profits-without-prosperity …) so that they can manipulate short term stock price for their own benefits.
Show this thread -
5/ We’ve seen the same phenomenon in crypto, many altcoin creators engage in heavy pump & marketing schemes, despite a shitty technical foundation. They don’t care about long term success, only short term gains.
Show this thread -
6/ So Point 2: having money as the primary motivator does not always produce the desired outcome. Even in the corporate world, the effectiveness of stock compensation package as an interest alignment mechanism is questionable.
Show this thread -
7/ Point 3: this is a decentralized movement, remember? Demanding some central figure to own coins so that the decentralized movement could live on... it’s quite ironic.
Show this thread -
8/ Point 4: even if having the creator owning coins is desirable, it is impossible to verify & enforce. Unlike stock trading, there are so many ways to acquire or unload coins anonymously & indirectly.
Show this thread -
9/ Charlie could have zero litecoins before yesterday. He could still own a million coins today. He could short LTC without touching his coins in the Trust. How the hell would you know?
Show this thread -
10/ Last but not least: There are better ways to align incentives than using money.
Show this thread -
11/ Why was stock compensation package necessary to begin with? because modern CEOs come from the outside & are typically not the original founders, so you need an extra motivator for them. But if the CEO *is* the founder, you don’t need an extra motivator.
Show this thread -
12/ Elon Musk threw his own assets into the businesses he created, risking bankruptcy several times. Why? Because he believes in his missions. No stock compensation package can ever come close to that kind of intensity.
Show this thread -
13/ It is the same reason why Buffett prefers to keep the original founders for the businesses he acquired. He knows it’s a tall order to replace them. Passion beats money when it comes to incentives. It’s just good business.
Show this thread -
14/ I support
@SatoshiLite ‘s decision to sell. Without a financial stake in Litecoin, Charlie can focus 100% on the long term success of Litecoin. Nothing can hold back the chikun now!Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Would be very helpful for the general public like me if
@SatoshiLite put out regular articles about$LTC in ways that an average joe can understand. 1) What does it do, 2) why is it better than other cryptos 3) what does the future hold for$LTC 4) when are the future dates? -
This might be a good starting place for you. :)https://medium.com/the-litecoin-school-of-crypto/1-an-intro-to-cryptocurrency-and-litecoin-20502e34dad0 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
One of the good guys in
$crypto who catches way too much shit any time he does the right thing.@SatoshiLite is a model for what crypto should be about, building the future - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
His got a point, well actually his got 14 points
-
5 points actually. He even counted them out one by one...
-
Good point
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
