What do you mean? Core won't propose a 2MB block. I wish they would, the industry and miners have been waiting for years, esp. since HK.
"Decentralization" has many aspects. Ppl tend to conflate all of them. See Balaji's post for contexthttps://news.21.co/quantifying-decentralization-e39db233c28e …
-
-
My argument is that miner centralization poses greater risk to the network than dev centralization.
-
In choosing what to defend against, we have to keep that in mind.
-
That doesn't answer my question. Dev and miner centralisation are not at odds with each other at all.
-
I was addressing what
@ErikVoorhees implies above that ppl who defend decentralization doesn't care about dev centralization. -
I'm saying it is a valid concern (at least to me) but it is not as important as keeping mining & network topology decentralized.
-
IMHO mining centralisation is hugely inflated as a problem, because people conflate ownership and control, and forget about incentives
-
That's true. IMHO though there are 2nd order effects to mining centralization. The miners might not directly weaken the network. 1/
-
But by making it prohibitively expensive for anyone to join this supposedly permissionless network, they indirectly do so. 2/
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
