If NYA was a plain agreement then there would be no need for BTC1, and the block size increase on Core would be sufficient. Plain open fact.
-
-
Theres no such thing as "protocol stagnation". Stable protocols built the web we know today. Whoever says "protocol stagnation" is very dumb
-
On the contrary, one can argue many problems with the Internet are due to the protocol being fixed and lacking in many aspects.
-
One example is the insane complexity & convolution of the web development stack.
-
Another example is TCP/IP didn't consider trust at the protocol layer. Resulted in a less secure, more vulnerable Internet.
-
So yes a fixed protocol gives you stability but don't kid yourself that it's the best we've got ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Stability? Full blocks results in instability. Keeping protocol rules, while completely altering how Bitcoin works isn't conservative.


-
A blockchain is a public, limited resource with infinite demand. Full blocks & fee market are unavoidable. There are elegant L2 solutions.
-
To be clear there is room for onchain scaling and I support that. Onchain scaling requires HFs though so we should approach that with care.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
