This is manifestly not true. That is why BTC1 is being prepared and why companies lied about the need to "upgrade" to it.
Everything in Bitcoin involves trade-offs. Genius of Satoshi was to select the correct ones. Single implementation is another example.
-
-
It increases the risk of dev centralization but the alternative is multiple clients which make consensus harder to achieve. Again, tradeoff.
-
Everything considered there are risks to dev centralization but the benefits far outweigh the costs. Not true with aspects like mining.
-
"Centralization" has many aspects, some more critical than others. Ppl tend to conflate all of them. Balaji's posthttps://news.21.co/quantifying-decentralization-e39db233c28e …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
