An N block reorg on Bitcoin with more proof-of-work appears out of nowhere with a double spend. How big does N have to be before you choose not to accept the reorg?
... since whoever capable of taking over majority hash rate & caused a deep reorg like that can easily overwhelm your minority chain if they need to. You can also change the hash algo with the HF, which'd brick all mining hardware- might not be a safe position to be in either. 
-
-
Although it would also depend on how much hash rate is behind the reorg
If it’s a clear majority, e.g. 90% chain A vs. 10% chain B, hardforking away while reusing the same hash algo is not a long term solution. But if its 55% vs 45%, better shot at survivability.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
