An apt summary of most if not all of non-PoW protocols: "we solve distributed consensus on X by assuming we have solved distributed consensus on Y." In the process you'd get fancy terms like "randomness beacon" that sounds sophisticated, but in reality just obfuscates the issue.https://twitter.com/random_walker/status/1043613473974964224 …
-
-
How is PoS different in your mind?
-
Or rephrased, can you be more specific in your criticism of circularity?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

