1/ Nice to see more in-depth articles investigating the extremely important role randomness plays in blockchains
h/t @aparnalocked
However, IMO this analysis of randomness is incomplete
https://www.tokendaily.co/blog/randomness-in-blockchains …
-
-
6/ Bitcoin is future-proof because it would provide an automated way for network nodes to come to consensus in the case of a network split, whether it's intentional or accidental (e.g., a network partition). Thanks again to randomness-based PoW.
Show this thread -
7/ Naive randomness mechanisms in PoS protocols do not give you either of these protections. PoS inevitably requires the intervention of trusted 3rd parties and significantly increases the social attack surface. In other words, PoS is nowhere near as trust-minimized as PoW.
Show this thread -
8/ In summary, randomness in PoW solves *two* crucial problems: a/ Leader-election b/ Unforgeable costliness Leader-election is only half the battle, arguably the less important half.
Show this thread -
9/ P.S. For a list of my writings on the problems with PoS:https://twitter.com/hugohanoi/status/1021831408489136128 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
