1/ Great article by @LaurentMT !
The TL;DR is that energy spent per block contributes not just to UTXOs belonging in that block, but retroactively to all global & past UTXOs.
The often-cited “energy spent per Bitcoin tx” number in many economic papers is flawed for this reason.https://twitter.com/LaurentMT/status/1034046547896492032 …
-
-
5/ To revert a tx, an attacker needs to overcome both types of stock. He needs to acquire the necessary hardware, AND spend an amount of energy proportional to the distance from the tip of the UTXO he wants to revert.
Show this thread -
6/ Of cos, if he wants to revert the most recent transaction (distance=0), then there’s not much stock in the ledger history for that transaction, but there’s still an enormous amount of stock in the hardware dimension.
Show this thread -
7/ The longer a transaction has occurred, the more stock it accumulates in the ledger history, and the harder it is for an attacker to revert.
Show this thread -
8/ In terms of hashes, stock in ledger history only goes up, never goes down. In terms of actual economic cost (and
@LaurentMT ’s “number of Bitcoin.days secured” metric), it could in theory go down, if say, a Quantum computer is invented & mass-produced tomorrow.Show this thread -
9/ In terms of economic cost, stock in mining hardware could also go up & down. A sustained bear market would likely cause the cost of acquiring ASICs to go down, while a bull market would do the opposite.
Show this thread -
10/ Mining centralization reduces the security provided by stock in mining hardware. But mining centralization does *not* reduce the security provided by stock in ledger history. A miner with majority hash rate still needs to spend tons of energy to go back far in history.
Show this thread -
11/ To sum it up, Bitcoin is protected by high stock-to-flow ratio in 2 dimensions: (i) Stock in ledger history - security can be weakened with advances in computing (ii) Stock in mining hardware - security can be weakened with bear markets & a high level of mining centralization
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
