3/ A small portion of the time you might be lucky & your equation accidentally fits. The majority of the time however, you’d be wildly off the mark.
-
Show this thread
-
4/ MV=PQ works if the token in question represents an established, widely-used money, such as the US Dollar.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
5/ But MV=PQ doesn’t work for a brand new asset such as Bitcoin that is still early in its adoption. And it especially does not work for altcoins & for the entire category of so-called “utility tokens”.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
6/ The reason is the PQ part. PQ assumes a token can capture most of the economic value of the network/service that it tries to represent.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
7/ PQ for Bitcoin hasn’t been established yet. Bitcoin is still very early in its quest to capture a significant portion of global GDP.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
8/ PQ for altcoins, if they compete with BTC to be money (and they have to), also haven’t been established. BTC is way ahead of them in this regard.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
9/ Even if your altcoin is supposedly designed for “dApps” not money, it still needs to succeed in being money first (including Ethereum). Otherwise your incentive scheme using native token won’t work.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
10/ PQ for “utility tokens” is even further behind in this race. In fact, if Bitcoin ends up capturing the PQ of *all* economic activity, your utility tokens might not be able to capture anything at all.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
11/ The assumption that you’d be able to lock users into exclusively using your token for your *decentralized* network is naive.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
12/ Even if decentralized token-based networks work, one can hold only bitcoins & exchange them for these tokens at the last minute. Meaning it will be *Bitcoin* that actually captures your network value.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread
13/ Remember: money is the ultimate “utility” token. The utility of money encompasses all sub-utilities.
-
-
Hugo Nguyen Retweeted Hugo Nguyen
14/ For more on why utility tokens make absolutely no sense: https://twitter.com/hugohanoi/status/976261540419534848 …
Hugo Nguyen added,
Hugo Nguyen @hugohanoi1/ Exactly. I never understood why companies cannot build so-called "tokenized services" directly on top of established tokens such as BTC (yes, BTC was the original token). The whole category of "utility tokens" just doesn't make any sense. https://twitter.com/MaxFangX/status/976031730460012545 …Show this thread0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
