Interesting. What happens if the share-chain reject a block but the main chain accepts it? Don't the main chain rules override the share-chain rules?
-
-
besides the high orphan rates
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1. Not scalable, if more hashers joined p2pool then everyone's payout variance went up 2. It disproportionately punished latency 20x more than the bitcoin network itself
-
Why #1? Generally isn't the rule "the more pool members, the lower the variance"?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
1. Perception that people were making less money 2. Difficulty of understanding how p2pool worked 3. Ease of use of centralized pools 4. Orphan rate/DoA leading to #1, #2
-
But high orphan rates *did* lead to lower profitability, did it not? So it's not just a perception.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
