Of course, these events tend to occur due to other people rejecting other kinds of social norms in how they act towards creators of infrastructural Open Source.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
And I don't mean that no one should criticize anything. E.g. the Rust community should be able to reject libraries who devs have cavalier attitude to soundness from de facto infrastructural status in the ecosystem while still toning down the rhetoric when having to do that.
Prikaži ovu nit -
The Rust community can be a bit too quick and harsh if you are perceived as doing something that people not yet in the community could use as a counter-example disproving Rust’s evangelism promises. (I’ve been perceived as doing such a thing.)
Prikaži ovu nit -
Also, unsurprisingly, many on HN don’t seem to get the difference between sound unsafe and unsound unsafe, which drives up the perceived concern of how this all looks to people who haven’t yet bought in.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
For clarity, the “e.g.” part is what I believe the social norm is, and some folks on HN seem to think it’s OK to do whatever if there was no support contact in place.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
"No one has any social or ethical obligations other than following the law" is the most poisonous attitude today.
-
Is there an official -ism name for this? (Or the related variant that one shouldn’t even be upset about the outcomes of that attitude?)
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.