Like I said elsewhere, flaunting your ignorance is not a wise move.
-
-
Replying to @hoongwaicheah @Maxton_MS
They flatly deny your statement. Who should i believe? The UK supreme court or UKIP?
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @panmisthropist @Maxton_MS
It's in your own screenshot...pic.twitter.com/W1FHtyaT0F
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hoongwaicheah @Maxton_MS
And what does 'give effect mean'? Is that being 'overruled'? Give me an overrule example you find egregious. I asked already.
2 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @panmisthropist @Maxton_MS
"Give effect" means giving ground to, or "overruled by". You demanded an example of UK losing sovereignty, I gave it.
2 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hoongwaicheah @Maxton_MS
And I showed how we don't even had control of own laws as the queen can refuse assent. Therefore we are not a democracy?
#asinine2 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @hoongwaicheah @Maxton_MS
To make clear it's not a proper arguement. I have no issues with #. I do when they are used in lieu of argument.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @panmisthropist @Maxton_MS
No, you just accused me of using hashtags in lieu of arguments when I actually haven't used one in years.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hoongwaicheah @Maxton_MS
UKIP do. You are their representative. This is how it works in politics I'm afraid.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes
guilt by association? I call it lying.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.