Competitive on WTO regs? Whereas the rest of the EU won't be. How's that work?
-
So cheaper and easier trade within a bloc of 600 million people is bad? You'd rather go head to head with China?
Being uncompetitive is bad. It means you lose the economic competence to go head to head with BRIC. Protectionism is harmful in the long run
-
-
Eu already trades with BRIC.
-
So no problem going head to head with BRIC then?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Uncompeteive by having a minimum wage, paid holiday, maternity lv, WTDs, environmental regs, pollution control, child labour laws you mean?
-
Again: no. Why do you keep making assumptions?
-
Because they are a natural consequence of your position. I would argue. You seem very confused.
-
Not really. They are a consequence of your dogma.
-
So now explain the actual benefits to the uk from being outside the CU. ones that outweigh the cons.
-
Sigh, what's the point? We've already won the referendum. Here's something I prepared earlier:https://hoongwai1984.wordpress.com/2016/03/19/the-positive-case-for-brexit-2-a-cost-benefit-analysis-of-eu-membership/ …
-
So you can't explain how we will benefit? You can just shout 'competitiveness' over and over.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.