if Trump can succeed with the EU, it will be much easier to succeed with the UK. It's much easier to strike FTAs with less complex economies
And the article doesn't even touch on the complications of unbalanced subsidies.
-
Even this concludes that outside of the CU prices would have been higher.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. Undo -
-
-
Do you fail to understand that this precisely describes the distortion that is occurring...?
-
Distortion assumes a natural state. None such esists. No market is free in any case. Not since Paleolithic times.
-
i made clear that the distortion is relative to the world stage.
-
There is no world stage. There is no world free market.
-
You don't need a free market to have a world stage. "World stage" simply means trading with the rest of the world. Which the WTO facilitates
-
So distorted compared to what?
New conversation -
-
-
So you want no NTBs and zero tariffs? Free markets?
-
I think reducing barriers to trade fairly across the board would be more advantageous than restricting it to only special friends.
-
So you'd remove all trading blocs? The world over. You'd remove NTBs? Inc health and safety standards? Labour & environmental laws?
-
Nope. These are bigger issues than is suitable for discussion on twitter. So pls stop making assumptions.
-
Many barriers are about standards. You're fine with China's employment regs? Think that's a fair comparison?
-
That's a different issue. Conflating trade with human rights gets yourself in a muddle. Did you know your iPhone is produced unethically?
-
You mean immorally surely? But how so?
-
I'd say "unethically" is more appropriate. An example:http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/business/apple-america-and-a-squeezed-middle-class.html …
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.