Now he just needs to follow through.
-
-
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
No ..he still voted "YES".
-
He voted yes to get it out of committee, but will vote no on the Senate floor if there’s no investigation.
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Thank you
@JeffFlake I sincerely hope they conduct the investigation and if not that you follow through and vote noBedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
No we don't. He did nothing. He should have voted no in committee, when he had the chance. There is no guarantee he'll get an investigation.
-
I agree, 'no' would have been better, but he threw a wrench into the
@GOP plan and that was enough to get this investigation started. It's being reported that Grassley has agreed to the FBI investigation. Good chance that would have never happened if it weren't for Flake.
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Did he, though?
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Why move
#Kavanaugh nomination out of Committee BEFORE FBI investigation is complete? Mayhaps cuz#MitchMcConnell can still steamroll over#JustWords@JeffFlake's "preference"?Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
He voted "yes." This is not cause for commendation, but rather condemnation. Frankly, if you believe this is a victory then we are running out of good options to vote for here in AZ.
-
But he will vote NO on the Senate floor if there’s no investigation. Sounds like Murkowski is with him. So... not enough votes to confirm Kavanaugh if there’s no investigation.
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.

