This *formalizes* the role of a CoC as a power-grab. Contra CoC, meritocratic (and fluid) power-structures determine who has the power to exclude. *Democracy* gives the power to a (yet another unacknowledged) power structure of socially powerful tyrants and bullies. https://twitter.com/hikikomorphism/status/1054458396164964352 …
-
-
The problem is: this is already the "Structureless" norm. *Unless* tyrants want to dictate what "persistently", "hitting on", and "uninterested" mean, there is no reason for a CoC. My argument is that they want to use their illegitimate, bullying, tyrannical power to do so.
-
tyrants, or (((tyrants)))? This is all getting very conspiratorial.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
you seem to have set up this strawman in which the only possible CoC is one that constrains political speech outside the context of a project, and you're doing an admirable job of tearing said strawman down
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.