Can't wait to see how many of the people who're concerned about SJW-inspired codes of conduct being adopted by open source projects have something to say about a major open source project adopting a specifically religious code of conduct that excludes non-believershttps://twitter.com/DarrenPMeyer/status/1054364170232258562 …
-
-
It's hard to bridge the gap between what's "obvious" to Benedict and what's obvious in the 21C, but the below is pretty insiderish. N.b. I'm not pointing to something "punished" -- your quote is also not actionable, per "we make no enforcement of the more introspective aspects".pic.twitter.com/FXqr0Gh6dz
-
This is a list of things that such projects _won't_ punish and thus literally the opposite of what I requested
-
The dangerous implicit is that you can be informally punished for making social faux-pas. That's why it specifically says they won't punish people who harshly correct you. Also you explicitly can't criticize back, which used to be the defense mechanism against Linus-style rants.
-
This is the standard talking point, but in every case I've seen it's been a sustained refusal to, eg, use someone's preferred pronouns and not a single slip-up
-
Likewise, I'm sure the SQLite folks won't burn you at a stake for being a filthy atheist. It all comes down to trust. I know lots of Catholics in real life so I know which parts of their code are for real and which are 'piety signalling', so to speak. But I know few SJWs.
-
I'm more or less the opposite, but there are definitely valid concerns on both sides
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.