And?
-
-
Replying to @drethelin
and setting up on a rooftop with long guns right before a protest is what one might refer to as getting ready for urban warfare
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hikikomorphism @drethelin
I think the key bit of information here is that they "weren't arrested & the public was never told": implies either that they had such a harmless explanation for being there that arresting them would've been bad PR, or that the "rooftop protestors" were actually cops themselves.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TristanSevers @drethelin
yes, a harmless explanation, also known as an alibi or cover story - all that's required is plausible deniability given that they hadn't yet broken any laws, and I don't consider that actual proof of anything. Also, you're assuming that the police are purely a neutral party here
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hikikomorphism @TristanSevers
The thing about having a harmless explanation for why you’re somewhere without breaking laws is it’s a lot more common in people who are actually harmless. If you break the presumption of “if you’re being ok, we won’t arrest you” this produced a smooth slope to banning all clubs
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @drethelin @TristanSevers
obligatory reminder that we're talking, specifically, about a group of paramilitaries setting up with long guns on a rooftop in advance of a protest being, hey, maybe a little suspicious and not about some extremely abstract general principle
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hikikomorphism @TristanSevers
Also I don’t know anything about the specific guys in question but I bet calling them a group of paramilitaries is like calling random Antifa protestors a group of insurgents.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
paramilitary is easy. you don't even have to do anything except march around and pretend to be a soldier in some regard. 'insurgent' is an actual combat thing.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Right but despite fitting the textbook definition it makes the side he's committed to defending look bad therefore it's unfair (sorry if this is overly cynical, but it fits)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This is the definition I’m going off of. What’s the textbook definition?pic.twitter.com/bxFvw0r9fz
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
you're the one who was arguing that they were just a gun club with political leanings which AFAIK qualifies, but ok
-
-
Replying to @hikikomorphism @drethelin and
Ayfkm a gun club with political leanings is not a paramilitary
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.