Wow @TeamYouTube just shut down our @theh3podcast live stream and gave us a strike for talking about Alex Jones??... What.
-
-
That is censorship, and censorship for no good reason. Alex Jones and his fake news and conspiracies and hate speech needed to be censored, but discussing him is important and not the same thing as being him. Do better
@TeamYouTube56 replies 19 retweets 532 likes -
Replying to @Admdvn @h3h3productions and
Nah fam, if you support censoring Alex Jones because Reasons, you support censorship for ALL because Reasons. and
@TeamYouTube just proved this point.21 replies 61 retweets 1,923 likes -
Replying to @ecoSilvio @Admdvn and
There’s a difference between censorship and removing someone from a private platform for hate speech
115 replies 1 retweet 508 likes -
Replying to @przjohnathon @Admdvn and
I cannot argue about the right of a company to ban someone they don't like, just don't take a moral high ground saying it is "hate speech".
16 replies 8 retweets 732 likes -
Replying to @Avery_Tephra @przjohnathon and
I know that whatever he says, he has the right to say it, even if I don't agree with it. Hate speech is a subjective concept.
14 replies 7 retweets 282 likes -
Replying to @ecoSilvio @przjohnathon and
He still has the right to say it (in some jurisdictions at least), but a private corporation is under no obligation to pay to host his content on their website. Comprende?
9 replies 0 retweets 27 likes
That literally is his point. He's saying it's censorship and violates right of free speech, but it doesn't... because it's a private entity that can choose what content to publish on their platform. It's a simple concept
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
// Apex pleb