At the risk of a dogpile, I am just gonna say here that entitling a book “Lie Back and Think of England” is a sure-fire way to get people to question your sense of humour AND your feelings about rape and consent— & maybe draw conclusions you don’t like. Glass houses, motes, pot
-
-
After not doing anything about the known predators in ISAS while on the board
@HFoxhallForbes you might consider the glass house you live in when it comes to implying others don’t care about women -
I made no comments about individuals here; I was observing that the title gives a particular impression. That impression may be false or misleading, but it is given by the choice of that title all the same. As we all know, the words we use matter.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Beg pardon? My subtweet was a response to the idea that there was ABSOLUTELY NO BASIS for comments on EW’s views on rape. The book title is effing rapey, period. So explain to me how pointing that out in the context of the kinds of conclusions you & others have consistently 1/
-
drawn about others — especially given my “glass houses, motes, pots” comment — is anything more than drawing attention to hypocrisy. Please, I’d love to hear it, especially if you can do it without resorting to the accusations you’ve already made in this thread. Also, for 2/
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Did all of you also tell this to Kathryn Gradval of Ravishing Maidens. The foundational book about medieval rape culture. Or Carissa Harris for calling her book Obscene Pedagogies? Or do neither of you have a clue about the critical work being down in medieval rape culture.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.