Philip Kitcher says that "the question of what counts as sufficient evidence [for a hypothesis] is not independent of the political consequences," and has claimed that research on intelligence is particularly dangerous. He rejects this work for political, not scientific, reasons.
-
-
-
More generally, should you be disappointed at my lack of future engagement with you on these topics, feel free to consult this for an explanation - baked in advance for just such occasions - http://henryfarrell.net/wp/blog/2018/04/09/race-iq/ …
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The more I learn about Kitcher the more admirable he seems.
-
Never met him, but everything I have read I have liked very much.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.