Hey, you've literally hit on a topic on debate in our courts, I.e. The legality of fictional representations of child porn and how far it /1
-
-
Replying to @BoozyBadger @chodemortar
Extends! This is really an interesting area of law and has led to a bit of a circuit split in regards to how it's treated. But the /2
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BoozyBadger @chodemortar
Comparison of the two isn't really legally apt as there isn't a federal law restricting the whole "animal fucker" thing, and if it was /3
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BoozyBadger @chodemortar
It'd be subject to the same interpretation question. Oh, to be clear, both fucking animals and kids is wrong, Kay? And for the record, /4
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BoozyBadger @chodemortar
"Furry porn" doesn't do a thing for me. You know what does? My adult spouse. But hey, since you're going for a straw man argument...
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @BoozyBadger @chodemortar
Yeah your adult spouse in a fur suit
11:19 AM - 3 Aug 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.