Now this is a laugh, Pelosi the constitutional textualist. Pelosi is only using the constitution to keep the show going. She isn't concerned with fair proceedings for Trump, or the Constitution. A document that protects citizens from the government. Inversion is forever in DC.
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
1/2 Wasn't "originalism" conservatives attempt to interpret Framers' words by divining their original intention? Such a method is spooky and deeply suspicious because it insists that other precedent & evolving circumstance are disregarded.
-
No. It is by *saying* they’re divining. BIG difference.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2/2 Here, Pelosi isn't required to disregard precedent & our circumstances are similar enough to Framers to just apply their meaning. In other words, I'm not sure why we'd call this "originalism." She's merely applying old words that we understand clearly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is actually QUITE easy. Read from the middle of this page down. Oh, and look up ‘peculation.’ https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/debates_720.asp …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Alexander, love your program on PBS. You have a great speaking voice also. I agree about Pelosi. Thanks for your work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.